Banking Commission propose regular monitoring of senior executives.

Posted · Add Comment

The Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards had made a recommendation to replace the Approved Person’s Vetting Regime with a Senior Person’s Regime which would include regular monitoring of the most senior bankers. In place of a one-off judgement of suitability on appointment, regulators would require on-going monitoring and executives would be held accountable for failure to meet their specified responsibilities.

Soon after this recommendation, figures were published by law firm Pinsent Mason from a freedom of information request to the FSA, which revealed that scrutiny of senior appointments by regulators has waned over the last year, with the FSA vetting just 4% of applicants for boardroom-level roles at financial organisations last year, less than half of the amount that they vetted at the peak of the financial crisis.

With the Commission having noted gaps in the current process for senior bankers, it is likely that the regulators will take note and HireRight anticipates a change to the Approved Person’s Regime in the future.

In line with the Commission’s recommendations, HireRight advocate enhanced background screening for senior appointments at the time of hire, with annual rescreening for the duration of tenure, as best practice to meet compliance obligations and deliver comprehensive risk mitigation.

Read full details of the Banking Commission’s report on changing banking for good.



HireRight is here to help guide you through the biggest screening challenges so you can focus on what’s important to you; attracting top talent. HireRight provides employment background screening services to organisations of any size, in every industry, and nearly anywhere.

More Posts

Follow Me:

The HireRight Blog is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Any statutes or laws cited in this article should be read in their entirety. If you or your customers have questions concerning compliance and obligations under United States or International laws or regulations, we suggest that you address these directly with your legal department or outside counsel.

Comments are closed.